Oh no she didn't

Look at Palin, all gleeful and smug as she dives into the mud and drags the bottom-feeder attempt to smear Obama as a "friend of terrorists" right up to the top of the ticket:

Meanwhile, McCain's calling Obama a "bald-faced liar" for explaining what McCain's asinine health care policy would actually do.

Desperate, cornered, mean as fuck. And lacking any kind of principles whatsoever. Underneath the anger that makes me want to claw their eyes out, I'm actually proud, knowing that Obama's campaign isn't going to wade into the gutter with these pathetic and shameless liars. Cheesy as it may sound, there are American values that are more important than contempt.


Edited to note, at some length, that the New Yorker agrees.

The longer the campaign goes on, the more the issues of personality and character have reflected badly on McCain. Unless appearances are very deceiving, he is impulsive, impatient, self-dramatizing, erratic, and a compulsive risk-taker. These qualities may have contributed to his usefulness as a “maverick” senator. But in a President they would be a menace.
By contrast, Obama’s transformative message is accompanied by a sense of pragmatic calm. A tropism for unity is an essential part of his character and of his campaign. It is part of what allowed him to overcome a Democratic opponent who entered the race with tremendous advantages. It is what helped him forge a political career relying both on the liberals of Hyde Park and on the political regulars of downtown Chicago. His policy preferences are distinctly liberal, but he is determined to speak to a broad range of Americans who do not necessarily share his every value or opinion. For some who oppose him, his equanimity even under the ugliest attack seems like hauteur; for some who support him, his reluctance to counterattack in the same vein seems like self-defeating detachment. Yet it is Obama’s temperament—and not McCain’s—that seems appropriate for the office both men seek and for the volatile and dangerous era in which we live. Those who dismiss his centeredness as self-centeredness or his composure as indifference are as wrong as those who mistook Eisenhower’s stolidity for denseness or Lincoln’s humor for lack of seriousness.

Via PostBourgie, who apparently get their New Yorkers before I do.